The substantive facts that attended the taking of appeal by Mrs. Kimberly K. Toure, appellant herein, from the final ruling of the Assigned Circuit Judge of the Sixth Judicial Circuit Court for Montserrado County
This appeal emanates from the ruling of the Board of Commissioners of the National Elections Commission (NEC), which affirmed a ruling by its Hearing Officer, regarding a controversy and
This case is before us on a motion to dismiss an appeal filed by Merlene Grimes McCall, the movant herein, against Kadie Sarnor Kamara, the respondent herein.
Madam Vice President;
Mr. Speaker & Members of the House of Representatives;
Mr. President Pro Tempore & Members of the Liberian Senate;
My Colleagues of the Supreme Court;
Former Chief Justices & Associate Justices of the Supreme Court;
The Resident Coordinator & Staff of the United Nations in Liberia;
The Doyen & Members of the Diplomatic Corps;
The walls of the sacred Chambers of the Supreme Court reverberated with the recitals of sections 17.1 and 17.6 of the New Judiciary Law Revised Code in a four-day sitting of this Court to examine and pass on the petitions of attorneys-at-law who petitioned the Court to become members of its Bar. Mr. Chief Justice Francis
The appeal before this Court grows out of the October 22, 2020 final ruling of Her Honor Comfort S. Natt, Judge of the National Labor Court, Montserrado County, Republic of Liberia, who confirmed the January 15, 2020 final ruling of the Hearing Officer, Honorable
Mindful of the possibility that errors, and impropriety may seep into the hearing and determination of legal disputes and consequently affect the rights and interests of the parties, the proponents of our legal system have designed that judgments/decisions of inferior judicial tribunals are subject to review before superior forums with the Supreme Court being the final arbiter. Party litigants
This appeal is from the final ruling of the National Labor Court, the latter which confirmed the ruling of the hearing officer of the Ministry of Labor adjudging the
appellant, the Management of Intercon Security Systems liable for unfair labor practices and awarding the appellees, Willie D. Kerkula et al., the amount of US$620,418.02 (Six Hundred Twenty Thousand Four Hundred Eighteen United States Dollars, Two cents) for wrongful dismissal
The Revised Rules of the Supreme Court, IX Part 1 grants unto a party the option of a second opportunity to have their appeal heard via the filing of a petition for re-argument, albeit, said hearing is only as to some palpable substantial mistake which the petitioner believes that the Court inadvertently
This appeal grows out of an action of ejectment filed by Mr. Aboubacar Jalloh, appellee herein, on May 26, 2009 against Papa, Ansu and Ma (to be identified), appellants herein. The complaint substantially alleged that the appellee is the owner of a three bedroom house by virtue of
Recent Comments