Author: Flomo Wolobah

When this case was called for hearing, Counsellors David B. Gibson, Jr., of the Renaissance Law Group and S. Gayah Karmo, Pro se appeared for the appellants.
Counsellors A. Ndubuisi Nwabudike and Benedict F. Sannoh of the Sannoh & Partners, PC, appeared for the appellees.

Having carefully reviewed the certified records, heard the arguments and contentions advanced by the counsels representing the parties and considered the laws cited and relied upon, it is hereby

And being also conscious that Appellee National Elections Commission had failed to conduct a hearing and thereby afford the appellants the guaranteed due process of law opportunity mandated by the Constitution, statutory and case laws of the Republic, to determine the penalty to be imposed upon Co-appellant Harrison S. Kainwea, Sr. for his violation of the Code;

And acknowledging further that the records in this case, as certified to the Supreme Court, lack any evidence that the final decision of Appellee National Elections Commission in rejecting the application of Co-appellant Harrison S. Karnwea, Sr. and barring him from contesting the vice presidential position on Co-appellant Libefi Party ticket in the ensuing October 2017 Elections, was done by the Board of Commission, but rather that same appears on the records to have been done on the lone and sole signature of the Chairman of the Appellee, it is hereby

When this case was called for hearing, Counselor Albert S. Sims and Golda A. Bonah-Elliot Sherman and Sherman Inc. appear for the appellant. Counselor Hector W. Quoigcah, County Attorney for Nimba County, Ministry of Justice, appeared for Nimba County Counselor Beyen D. Howard appeared for the Public Procurement and concession Commission (PPCC). Counselor Famere G> Stubblefield of Stubblefield, Nigba and Associates, appeared for North Star Industries, Inc.

Having carefully reviewed and considered the facts and circumstances of the case, listened to the arguments advanced by counsels for the parties, examined the laws cited and relied on, it is hereby

Having reviewed the facts and circumstances of this case, listened to the arguments advanced by counsels representing the
parties’ and in due consideration of the laws applicable, it is hereby

Counselor Betty Lamin Blamo, Solicitor General, Ministry of Justice, Counselor Augustine C. Fayiah, Assistant Minister for Litigation, Ministry of Justice and Counselor J. Daku Mulbah, County Attorney for Montserrado County. appeared for the respondent.
‘
Having carefully reviewed the records, heard the arguments and contentions advanced by the counsels representing the parties and considered the laws cited and relied upon, it is hereby

Having listened to the arguments and contentions advanced by the parties, reviewed the facts and circumstances presented in the records, and examined the laws controlling in the case; and being satisfied that egregious errors and gross irregularities were committed by the Judge of the Monthly and Probate Court for Montserrado in the handling and disposition of the proceedings in the case, firstly, in not only granting the motion to dismiss due to a want of iurisdiction by the Monthly and Probate Court; secondly, by proceeding without jurisdiction to go into the bill of information and to do so without a hearing to ascertain the

Counsellor Betty Lamin Blamo, Solicitor General, Republic of Liberia, appeared for the respondent.

Having carefully examined and reviewed the facts and circumstances of this case, listened to the arguments advanced by counsels for the parties, and in due consideration of the laws applicable, it is hereby

When the case was called for hearing, Counsellor Stephen B. Dunbar of the Dunbar and Dunbar law Offices appeared for the movant/appellee. Counsellor G. Alfred Soyeh of the law Offices of Sayeh and Sayeh appeared for the respondents/appellants.

Having listened to the arguments and contentions advanced by the parties, reviewed the facts and circumstances presented in the records, and examined the laws controlling in the case; and being satisfied that the respondents/appellants failed to meet the requirements of the law for the perfection of an appeal, without which the Supreme Court tacks the required jurisdiction to probe into the merits of the appeal, it is hereby

When this case was called for hearing, Counsellor Nyenati Tuan of the Tuan Wreh Law Firm, appeared for the appellant. Counsellor Yamie Quiqui Gbeisay of the Tiala. & Associates Law Associates, Inc., appeared for the appellees

Having carefully reviewed the records, listened to the arguments and contentions advanced by the counsels representing the parties, and reviewed the laws controlling in this case, it is hereby