Category: Justice Wolokollie

SOLOMOM NGLKIA VS. JOSEPH MOMOH (07/05/2023) 0

2023 Opinions / Justice Wolokollie / Recent Decisions

5 Jul, 2023

SOLOMOM NGLKIA VS. JOSEPH MOMOH (07/05/2023)

This is an appeal from a final ruling rendered in an action of ejectment filed by the appellee James Z. Momoh by and thru his Attorney-in-Fact George Lansana Fallah against the appellants Solomon Ngekia, Hawa Fahnbulleh, Ansumana Sheriff, Beatrice Johnson et al, in Sixth Judicial Circuit Court, Montserrado County. The appellee alleged that the appellants are withholding his property and have refused to vacate the said property despite several requests for them to do so. After several interlocutory challenges by the appellants, the Civil Law Court rendered final judgment against the appellants, adjudging them liable in ejectment and ordering that they be ousted and evicted from the subject property. The appellants now ask this Court to reverse the adverse judgment entered by the Civil Law Court against them.
The records reveal that the appellee filed the action of ejectment on April 27, 2010, before the Civil Law Court, Montserrado County; that based on the complaint, the court issued out the writ of summons along with the complaint for service on the appellants. The returns of the sheriff indicated that the Co-appellant Ansumana Sheriff received the court’s precepts but refused to sign the copy of the writ of summons, while the rest of the

Intestate Estate of Shad Kaydea v Varlee Trawally (07/05/2023) 0

2023 Opinions / Justice Wolokollie / Recent Decisions

5 Jul, 2023

Intestate Estate of Shad Kaydea v Varlee Trawally (07/05/2023)

The facts in this case are not in dispute. The appellant (lessor) leased a piece of property known as the OAC compound to the appellee (lessee) on December 24, 2005, for a period of Twenty years (20) years, commencing from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2026, for an annual rent of Three Thousand United States Dollars (US$3,000) payable at the beginning of each year. Clause Ten (10) of the lease agreement between the parties provides that in the event the leased property is assigned or subleased by the appellee to a third party, the appellant would be entitled to Twenty-Five Percent (25%) of the difference in the rent payable to the appellee under the sub-lease agreement and the rent payable by the appellee under the original lease agreement. Clause Six (6) of the lease agreement also provides that if the appellee fails to make rental payment within thirty (30) days of the beginning of a year, such failure shall be considered a material breach of the agreement and the appellant shall have the right to oust and or evict the appellee from the leased property.

Fahnma Shopping Complex VS J. Fallah Business Center (07/05/2023) 0

2023 Opinions / Justice Wolokollie / Recent Decisions

5 Jul, 2023

Fahnma Shopping Complex VS J. Fallah Business Center (07/05/2023)

This is an appeal from a final ruling in a declaratory judgment in the court below. When the case was called for hearing, one of counsels who appeared for the appellee, J. Fallah Business Center, made an application on the Court’s record praying for a dismissal of the appeal on ground that the appellant Management of Fahnma Shopping Complex failed to perfect its appeal in keeping with Chapter 51.1 of the Civil Procedure Law, 1LCLR. The appellee’s counsel stated in his application that final judgment in the case was rendered by the Civil Law Court on June 4, 2021, and the appellant excepted thereto and announced an appeal therefrom; that the appellant filed its bill of exceptions on June 15, 2021, a day outside the mandatory ten-day period for the filing of the bill of exceptions; that the notice of completion of appeal was filed on June 17, 2021; that based upon the late filing of the bill of exceptions, the appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in the court below but the trial judge denied the motion, ruling that the appellant had already filed its notice of completion of appeal, thereby divesting the court of jurisdiction to act on the motion. Appellee counsel therefore prayed this Court to dismiss the appellant’s appeal for its failure to file a bill of exceptions within the time required by the appeal statute.

Intestate Estate of Zoe-Gar v. Intestate Estate of Francis R.T. Gardiner (05/19/2023) 0

2023 Opinions / Justice Wolokollie / Recent Decisions

19 May, 2023

Intestate Estate of Zoe-Gar v. Intestate Estate of Francis R.T. Gardiner (05/19/2023)

This case presents a legal issue that has been settled by this Court in several Opinions. We are therefore left to wonder why a long standing member of this Honorable Supreme Court Bar would elect to waste the Court’s time by raising the same issue on appeal. This speaks to the fact that despite many pleas from this Court requiring that lawyers acquaint themselves with Opinions of this Court, they have deliberately chosen not to be au courant with the Court’s Opinions, or it is a scheme by lawyers to bring up settled issues before this Court on appeal as a means to deliberately delay and baffle the settlement of proceedings in the court below. The Code of Moral and Professional Ethics of lawyers provides in Rule 31 that a lawyer’s appearance in court should be deemed equivalent to an assertion on his honor that in his opinion his client’s case is one proper for judicial determination.

MAMBA POINT HOTEL Vs. JANNEH DEE (05/19/2023) 0

2023 Opinions / Justice Wolokollie / Recent Decisions

19 May, 2023

MAMBA POINT HOTEL Vs. JANNEH DEE (05/19/2023)

On May 20, 2016, the appellee, Janneh Dee, filed an action of damages for wrong against the Appellant Management of Mamba Point Hotel before the Civil Law Court, Sixth Judicial Circuit, Montserrado County, substantially alleging that she was injured as the result of the appellant’s negligence. In her complaint, the appellee stated that she was employed by the appellant as a waitress and served the appellant with commitment, sincerity and dedication for several years until she sustained a severe spinal injury at the instance of the appellant. Appellee alleged that on December 4, 2014, while on duty as a waitress serving customers upstairs at the appellant’s business premises in Monrovia, Montserrado County, she felt the urge to use the bathroom and proceeded downstairs to the staff bathroom; that after using the bathroom, she began to make her way back upstairs to her work station, and while on the stairways from the bathroom she slipped on the wet floor tiles, and fell down with her back to the floor; that pursuant to the fall, she began to feel severe pain in her waist and other parts of her body and she

INTESTATE ESTATE OF EDMUND CISCO V. MOUNT SANAI (05/19/2023) 0

2023 Opinions / Justice Wolokollie / Recent Decisions

19 May, 2023

INTESTATE ESTATE OF EDMUND CISCO V. MOUNT SANAI (05/19/2023)

The facts as the certified records reveal are that the late Edmond D. Cisco purchased a half (1/2) lot of land lying and situated in Larkpazee community, Sinkor, Monrovia from Africanus L.M. Mapleh in 1974. Edmond D. Cisco died intestate and upon his death, one of the six children born out of his body, Joshua Cisco, obtained Letters of Administration from the Monthly and Probate Court for Montserrado County authorizing him to administer the intestate of his late father. The said letters of administration was issued to Joshua Cisco on September 13, 2017. Based on the authority conferred on him as administrator of the intestate estate of Edmond D. Cisco, Joshua Cisco obtained Court’s Decree of Sale and thereafter conveyed the half (1/2) lot of land acquired by the late Edmond D. Cisco in 1974 to the appellee herein, Mount Sanai Tabernacle. This conveyance was made on August 14, 2018, and an Administrator’s Deed issued as evidence thereof.

Related

Recent Comments

More