Category: Justice Yuo

THE INTESTATE ESTATE OF AB MARS V. ALEXANDER FREEMAN (04/12/2023) 0

2023 Opinions / Justice Yuo / Recent Decisions

12 Apr, 2023

THE INTESTATE ESTATE OF AB MARS V. ALEXANDER FREEMAN (04/12/2023)

This motion to dismiss presents a single issue for our determination viz.: whether or not an appeal is dismissible for failure of the appellant to transcribe the records to this Court.
The Supreme Court has opined in numerous of its Opinions that where a motion to dismiss an appeal is presented for determination, the Supreme Court is estopped from entering upon the records to make any determination of the substantive issues on appeal; that even in instances where the Court elects to consolidate the motion to dismiss the appeal with the main appeal, the Court must first determine the justifiability of the contention(s) presented in the motion; except the Court determines that the contentions are not tenable for the dismissible of the appeal, it cannot proceed to make determination of the appeal on

IN RE THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE NATIONAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION PLANNED CONDUCT OF THE VOTERS (04/12/2023) 0

2023 Opinions / Justice Yuo / Recent Decisions

12 Apr, 2023

IN RE THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE NATIONAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION PLANNED CONDUCT OF THE VOTERS (04/12/2023)

According to legal scholars of constitutional law, “the constitution represents the Supreme written will of the people regarding the framework for their Government. Where a constitution asserts a certain right, or lays down a certain principle of law or procedure, it speaks for the entire people as their supreme law, and it is the paramount authority for all that is done in pursuance of its provisions. The constitution embodies fundamental values and articulates the

FEDRICK KROMAH VS BEA MOUNTAIN (01/26/2023) 0

2023 Opinions / Justice Yuo / Recent Decisions

26 Jan, 2023

FEDRICK KROMAH VS BEA MOUNTAIN (01/26/2023)

This appeal emanates from a final ruling of the National Labor Court on a petition for
judicial review, reversing the decision of the hearing officer of the Ministry of Labor,
which held the appellee Messrs. Bea Mountain Mining Company liable for wrongful
dismissal of the appellants, Mr. Fredrick Kromah and eighteen (18) other workers.

LACC REVISED (01/26/2023) 0

2023 Opinions / Justice Yuo / Recent Decisions

26 Jan, 2023

LACC REVISED (01/26/2023)

The genesis of this case is traced to the date of August 21, 2008, when the Legislature, pursuant to its authority enumerated in Articles 34(l) and 89 of the Constitution (1986), passed into law, “An Act to Establish the Liberian Anti- Corruption Commission. The purpose of this Act in a nutshell, was to create the Liberia Anti-Corruption Commission (LACC) with the power to investigate corruption and prosecute same in conjunction with the Ministry of Justice. According to Section 6.1 of this law, the LACC was to be composed

Related

Recent Comments

More