Tagged: bill of information

Paye Flomo, James Flomo and Oliver Flomo vs. His Hon. Roland F. Dahn, and Zawolo Gbonblee and Chester Gbonblee  (05/19/2023) 0

Paye Flomo, James Flomo and Oliver Flomo vs. His Hon. Roland F. Dahn, and Zawolo Gbonblee and Chester Gbonblee (05/19/2023)

The facts gathered from the certified records before this court revealed that an action of Summary Proceeding to Recover Possession of Real Property was filed by the Intestate Estate of Johnny Gbonblee by and through, its administrators Zarwolo Gbonblee et al., Respondent herein, against Paye Flomo, James Flomo and Oliver Flomo, both of Sokopa, Nimba County, Informants herein, on August 26, 2011, at the 8th Judicial Circuit Court, Nimba County. The record revealed that pleading rested and trial commenced on October 7, 2011. The Respondent paraded three witnesses, who essentially testified to its title deed, supporting documents and possession of the contested property; The Respondent thereafter rested with the production of oral evidence and the instruments testified to were marked by the court, confirmed and admitted into evidence to form an integral part of the case.

Madam Nahad Hage Mensah vs. Roomy Brothers (02/01/22) 0

Madam Nahad Hage Mensah vs. Roomy Brothers (02/01/22)

The informant herein, Madam Nohad Hage Mensah, filed this bill of information on December 20, 2020 before the Supreme Court of Liberia principally alleging that on June 25, 2020, this Court handed down final judgment in an action of summary proceeding to recover possession of real property which was initially filed before the Paynesville Magisterial Court; that on June 29, 2020, the magisterial court, presided over by His Honor William G. Saygah, resumed jurisdiction over the case after the reading of the Supreme Court’s mandate;

Deborah Mills v. J. VInton Holder et al. (08/25/2021) 0

Deborah Mills v. J. VInton Holder et al. (08/25/2021)

This bill of information proceedings grow from a Judgment of the Supreme Court, rendered on August 5, 2019, wherein this Court mandatorily adjudged as follows:

“… that the appellants should forthwith retroactively remit to the appellee proceeds representing her one third interest in the estate for the last five years and henceforth remit regularly, her one third of any and all proceeds received from the