Author: Flomo Wolobah

Youth for Development & Productivity/ YODAP vs The Government of the Republic of Liberia (02/13/2026) 0

Youth for Development & Productivity/ YODAP vs The Government of the Republic of Liberia (02/13/2026)

On February 24, 2016, the Commercial Court dismissed a claim of debt filed by the Youth for Development and Productivity (YODAP), the appellant herein, against the Government of Liberia (GoL). Predicated upon this ruling, the appellant announced and perfected an appeal before this Supreme Court for appellate review.
The appellant, YODAP, a non-governmental organization registered and operating under the laws of Liberia, filed this action of debt against the Republic of Liberia, contending that the Republic of China (ROC) and the Republic of Liberia signed a “Bilateral Agreement” on April 22, 2003, wherein the Republic of China pledged developmental assistance

Life Saving Center of Jesus Christ International vs Freddenis K. Nagbe of the United States of America (02/12/2026) 0

Life Saving Center of Jesus Christ International vs Freddenis K. Nagbe of the United States of America (02/12/2026)

This appeal currently before us evolves from a judgment rendered by our colleague, Her Honor Ceaineh D. Clinton Johnson, while presiding as Justice in Chambers during the 2025 March Term of this Honorable Supreme Court of Liberia.
The facts as culled from the records, reveals that the appellant, Life Saving Center of Jesus Christ International, initially instituted an action of felonious restraint against the appellee, Freddennis K. Nagbe, through his attorney-in-fact, Emmanuel K. Wesseh, on August 21, 2023, before the West Point Magisterial Court. The appellant contended that the appellee had illegally occupied its property which it obtained through squatter’s

Intestate Estate of Kaifa Kamara and Hassan Fawaz, a Lebanese National, Lessee of Kaifa Kamara vs Intestate Estate of Rebecca Thomas 0

Intestate Estate of Kaifa Kamara and Hassan Fawaz, a Lebanese National, Lessee of Kaifa Kamara vs Intestate Estate of Rebecca Thomas

This appeal is taken from the ruling of a declaratory judgment filed on January 12, 2016, in the Civil Law Court for Montserrado, Republic of Liberia. The Petition for Declaratory Judgment was originally filed against Mr. Kaifa Kamara but during the pendency of the case, he died. As a result, the court, upon request of Mr. Kamara’s counsel, substituted the deceased on June 21, 2016, with Dauson Varney Kamara, A. Vaifee Tulay, Siafa Benjamin and Austin H. Kamara, all of whom subsequently became the administrators of the intestate estate of the deceased.
The appellant, the intestate estate of Kaifa Kamara

Frank Goll vs Rosetta Nagbe Jackollie, Prince N. Saye and Jacquelline A. Saye  (02/12/2026) 0

Frank Goll vs Rosetta Nagbe Jackollie, Prince N. Saye and Jacquelline A. Saye (02/12/2026)

This appeal emanates from the adjudication of an ‘Action of Ejectment’ filed in the Sixth Judicial Circuit Court of Montserrado County, Republic of Liberia. Judgement having been rendered for the appellees, the appellant excepted and appealed to this Honorable Supreme Court for an appellant review.
The facts gathered from the records indicate that the appellees, Rosetta Nagbe Jackollie, Prince N. Saye, and Jacqueline A. Saye, initially filed the ejectment action on March 18, 2022, but withdrew and refiled an amended complaint on April 6, 2022. The appellees assert in their complaint that they are bona fide owners of four lots

The Management of Access Bank Liberia vs. His Honor, Joseph Kollie (02/12/2026) 0

The Management of Access Bank Liberia vs. His Honor, Joseph Kollie (02/12/2026)

Section 14.4 (a) of the Decent work Act (2015) states:

(a) An employer may only terminate the employment of an employee for just cause, based on:

i) The (in)ability of the employee to perform the work required of them in accordance with the terms of:

(1) Their Contract;

(2) Any Collective agreement that applies to their work; or

(3) This Act and any regulations made under it; or

ii) The conduct of the employee:

(1) At work; or

(2) In circumstances which have a real and substantial connection to the working relationship; or

iii) The operational requirements of the undertaking

Samuel D. Tweah, et al  vs. His Honor Roosevelt Willie (02/12/2026) 0

Samuel D. Tweah, et al vs. His Honor Roosevelt Willie (02/12/2026)

The original petition for the writ of prohibition into an alleged case of economic sabotage, theft of property, money laundering, criminal facilitation, and criminal conspiracy against Samuel D. Tweah, Former Minister of Finance & Development Planning, Counsellor Nyenati Tuan, Former Acting Minister of Justice, Stanley S. Ford, Former Director of the Financial Intelligence Agency, Moses P. Cooper, Former Comptroller of the Financial Intelligence Agency and Jefferson Karmoh, Former National Security Advisor was heard on November 17, 2025 and decided on December 18, 2025, in which case this Court denied the petitioners’ petition for the writ of prohibition and ordered the

Liberia Agriculture Corporation (LAC) and Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA) vs. The Liberian Revenue Authority (02/12/2026) 0

Liberia Agriculture Corporation (LAC) and Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA) vs. The Liberian Revenue Authority (02/12/2026)

The appellant, Liberian Agricultural Corporation (LAC), is before this Court based upon an appeal from the final ruling of the Tax Court, Montserrado County, in an action of petition for judicial review instituted by the appellee herein, the Liberia Revenue Authority (LRA) represented by its Commissioner General, Mr. James Dorbor Jallah. The appellant has presented for our review, a twenty-three (23) count bill of exceptions which they allege constitute reversible errors committed by the trial judge. We first examine the trial records to ascertain the facts and circumstances that culminated into the present appeal.
The certified records reveal that the

Liberty Christian Center Overcomers vs Mrs. Nohad Mensah formerly Nohad Milage Hage (02/12/2026) 0

Liberty Christian Center Overcomers vs Mrs. Nohad Mensah formerly Nohad Milage Hage (02/12/2026)

The instant appeal originates from a final ruling rendered by the trial judge of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Civil Law Court, Montserrado County, in an action of ejectment, wherein the jury returned a verdict of liable against the appellants herein, Liberty Christian Center Overcomers and Ms. Bernice Blamah, and in favor of the appellee herein, Mrs. Nohad Mensah formerly Nohad M. Hage, represented by and thru her attorney-in-fact, Mrs. Edith Hage Seigeh.

The allegations contained in the complaint basically state that the appellee, Mrs. Nohad Mensah is the owner of two (2) lots of land, lying and situated in the

The Management of Samaritan’s Purse, International and Sylvester Nyanigbaye, an employee of Samaritan’s Purse, Int’l vs. Captain Joseph D. Moulton (02/12/2026) 0

The Management of Samaritan’s Purse, International and Sylvester Nyanigbaye, an employee of Samaritan’s Purse, Int’l vs. Captain Joseph D. Moulton (02/12/2026)

This appeal emanates from the final ruling of the Civil Law Court, Sixth Judicial Circuit for Montserrado County, sitting in its March Term, A. D. 2011, presided over by His Honor Peter W. Gbeneweleh, Assigned Circuit Judge. The court, on May 20, 2021, having entertained argument pro et con into the appellee’s action of damages for wrong, filed against the first and second appellants, ruled, holding the defendants/appellants liable to the plaintiff/appellee.

The facts culled from the records reveal that on October 16, 2009, the appellee, plaintiff in the court below, Captain Joseph D. Moulton, an Immigration Officer of the

Workers Union of Mesurado Group of Companies vs. The Management of Mesurado Group of Companies (02/12/2026) 0

Workers Union of Mesurado Group of Companies vs. The Management of Mesurado Group of Companies (02/12/2026)

The appellant, (Workers Union of Mesurado Group of Companies) seeks a review by this Court of a decision rendered by the National Labor Court, in which the trial judge ruled denying the petitioner’s petition for judicial review on grounds that the matter was already handled by his predecessor and as such, he could not review same, and that the said petition was only intended to delay and waste the court’s time and proceeded to fine the lawyer who filed the said petition.

The appellant excepted to this ruling of the National Labor Court and filed this appeal before this Court.