Clarence L. Simpson, III VS A. I. D. Enterprise
Having reviewed the facts and circumstances of this case, listened to the arguments advanced by counsels representing the
parties’ and in due consideration of the laws applicable, it is hereby
Having reviewed the facts and circumstances of this case, listened to the arguments advanced by counsels representing the
parties’ and in due consideration of the laws applicable, it is hereby
Counselor Betty Lamin Blamo, Solicitor General, Ministry of Justice, Counselor Augustine C. Fayiah, Assistant Minister for Litigation, Ministry of Justice and Counselor J. Daku Mulbah, County Attorney for Montserrado County. appeared for the respondent.
‘
Having carefully reviewed the records, heard the arguments and contentions advanced by the counsels representing the parties and considered the laws cited and relied upon, it is hereby
Having listened to the arguments and contentions advanced by the parties, reviewed the facts and circumstances presented in the records, and examined the laws controlling in the case; and being satisfied that egregious errors and gross irregularities were committed by the Judge of the Monthly and Probate Court for Montserrado in the handling and disposition of the proceedings in the case, firstly, in not only granting the motion to dismiss due to a want of iurisdiction by the Monthly and Probate Court; secondly, by proceeding without jurisdiction to go into the bill of information and to do so without a hearing to ascertain the
Counsellor Betty Lamin Blamo, Solicitor General, Republic of Liberia, appeared for the respondent.
Having carefully examined and reviewed the facts and circumstances of this case, listened to the arguments advanced by counsels for the parties, and in due consideration of the laws applicable, it is hereby
When the case was called for hearing, Counsellor Stephen B. Dunbar of the Dunbar and Dunbar law Offices appeared for the movant/appellee. Counsellor G. Alfred Soyeh of the law Offices of Sayeh and Sayeh appeared for the respondents/appellants.
Having listened to the arguments and contentions advanced by the parties, reviewed the facts and circumstances presented in the records, and examined the laws controlling in the case; and being satisfied that the respondents/appellants failed to meet the requirements of the law for the perfection of an appeal, without which the Supreme Court tacks the required jurisdiction to probe into the merits of the appeal, it is hereby
When this case was called for hearing, Counsellor Nyenati Tuan of the Tuan Wreh Law Firm, appeared for the appellant. Counsellor Yamie Quiqui Gbeisay of the Tiala. & Associates Law Associates, Inc., appeared for the appellees
Having carefully reviewed the records, listened to the arguments and contentions advanced by the counsels representing the parties, and reviewed the laws controlling in this case, it is hereby
When this case was called for hearing, Counsellor Charles H. Gibson appeared for the appellant. Counsellors Rosemarie B. James and Emmanuel B. James of the International Group of Legal Advocates and Consultants appeared for the appellee.
Having reviewed the certified records in this case, listened to the arguments advanced by the parties, and taken note of the records and laws applicable for a judicial settlement of the matter, it is hereby
When this case was called for hearing, Counselor Cooper W. Krauh of the Henries Law Firm appeared for the movants/appellees. Counselor C. Alexander Zoe of the Zoe and Partners Law Offices appeared for the respondent/a appellant.
Having reviewed the contentions raised in both the motion to dismiss the appeal and the resistance thereto, and having taken cognizance of the relevant laws appertaining thereto, it is hereby
When this case was cailed fbr hearing, Counsellor Amara M. Sheriff of the Sherman and
Sherman Inc., appeared for the movants/appellees. Counsellor Peter W. Howard, appeared for there respondents/appellants.
Having carefully examined the records, and listened to the arguments on both sides and
considered the evidence and the laws relevant thereto, it is hereby
When this case was called for hearing, Counselor Joseph N. Blidi, In-House Counsel, appeared for the National Elections Commission (NEC), Informant. Counsellor Albert S, Sims appeared for Co-Informant, Jim Womba Tornonlah. Counsellors Saymah Syrenius Cephus and James N. Kumeh appeared for Respondent, National Patriotic Party (NPP). Counsellor Yamie Quiqui Gbeisay
appeared for the Congress for Democratic Change (CDC) and Prof. Ansu D. Sonii
Having reviewed the certified records and the submissions made by the parties, it is hereby
Recent Comments