Tagged: ACTION OF EJECTMENT

Fallah Willie et al Vs. Yuissif Fahnbulleh et al (08/11/2023) 0

Fallah Willie et al Vs. Yuissif Fahnbulleh et al (08/11/2023)

This case is before us on appeal from the final ruling of the assigned Judge of the 6th Judicial Circuit, Civil Law Court, Montserrado County, sitting in its March Term A.D. 2016 in an action of ejectment filed by Yussif B. Fahnbulleh and Frazeanatu Fahnbulleh, represented by and through their Guardian, Madam Doris Z. Menwon of 72nd Community, Paynesville City, Montserrado County, appellees herein, against Fallah Willie, Joseph Saah and all occupants under their control and Archie T. Nazzal, also of 72nd community, Paynesville City, Montserrado County, Republic of Liberia, appellants herein.

The facts as gathered from the certified records of the case revealed that on December 9, 2013, the appellees by and through their guardian, (Natural mother) Madam Doris Z. Menwon, instituted an action of ejectment against appellants at the 6th Judicial Circuit, Civil Law Court, Montserrado County. The appellees alleged in their complaint that they are minor children of Madam Doris Menwon and Boakai Fahnbulleh, who were the original owners of the property and deeded the property, subject of these proceedings, to their minor children after they got divorced; that the said property lies along the Somalia Drive within the 72nd Barracks Community, and the frontage of the property faces the Somalia Drive. The appellees further

SOLOMOM NGLKIA VS. JOSEPH MOMOH (07/05/2023) 0

SOLOMOM NGLKIA VS. JOSEPH MOMOH (07/05/2023)

This is an appeal from a final ruling rendered in an action of ejectment filed by the appellee James Z. Momoh by and thru his Attorney-in-Fact George Lansana Fallah against the appellants Solomon Ngekia, Hawa Fahnbulleh, Ansumana Sheriff, Beatrice Johnson et al, in Sixth Judicial Circuit Court, Montserrado County. The appellee alleged that the appellants are withholding his property and have refused to vacate the said property despite several requests for them to do so. After several interlocutory challenges by the appellants, the Civil Law Court rendered final judgment against the appellants, adjudging them liable in ejectment and ordering that they be ousted and evicted from the subject property. The appellants now ask this Court to reverse the adverse judgment entered by the Civil Law Court against them.
The records reveal that the appellee filed the action of ejectment on April 27, 2010, before the Civil Law Court, Montserrado County; that based on the complaint, the court issued out the writ of summons along with the complaint for service on the appellants. The returns of the sheriff indicated that the Co-appellant Ansumana Sheriff received the court’s precepts but refused to sign the copy of the writ of summons, while the rest of the

Intestate Estate of Zoe-Gar v. Intestate Estate of Francis R.T. Gardiner (05/19/2023) 0

Intestate Estate of Zoe-Gar v. Intestate Estate of Francis R.T. Gardiner (05/19/2023)

This case presents a legal issue that has been settled by this Court in several Opinions. We are therefore left to wonder why a long standing member of this Honorable Supreme Court Bar would elect to waste the Court’s time by raising the same issue on appeal. This speaks to the fact that despite many pleas from this Court requiring that lawyers acquaint themselves with Opinions of this Court, they have deliberately chosen not to be au courant with the Court’s Opinions, or it is a scheme by lawyers to bring up settled issues before this Court on appeal as a means to deliberately delay and baffle the settlement of proceedings in the court below. The Code of Moral and Professional Ethics of lawyers provides in Rule 31 that a lawyer’s appearance in court should be deemed equivalent to an assertion on his honor that in his opinion his client’s case is one proper for judicial determination.

INTESTATE ESTATE OF EDMUND CISCO V. MOUNT SANAI (05/19/2023) 0

INTESTATE ESTATE OF EDMUND CISCO V. MOUNT SANAI (05/19/2023)

The facts as the certified records reveal are that the late Edmond D. Cisco purchased a half (1/2) lot of land lying and situated in Larkpazee community, Sinkor, Monrovia from Africanus L.M. Mapleh in 1974. Edmond D. Cisco died intestate and upon his death, one of the six children born out of his body, Joshua Cisco, obtained Letters of Administration from the Monthly and Probate Court for Montserrado County authorizing him to administer the intestate of his late father. The said letters of administration was issued to Joshua Cisco on September 13, 2017. Based on the authority conferred on him as administrator of the intestate estate of Edmond D. Cisco, Joshua Cisco obtained Court’s Decree of Sale and thereafter conveyed the half (1/2) lot of land acquired by the late Edmond D. Cisco in 1974 to the appellee herein, Mount Sanai Tabernacle. This conveyance was made on August 14, 2018, and an Administrator’s Deed issued as evidence thereof.

Sophronia Richard VS The Intestate of Mbolon 0

Sophronia Richard VS The Intestate of Mbolon

When this case was called for hearing, Counsellor Morris M. Davis, Jr. of the Kemp
& Associates appeared for the appellant. Counsellor Mamee S. W. Gongbah, Jr. of the Liberty Law Firm appeared for the appellee.

Having carefully reviewed the records, heard the arguments and contentions advanced by the counsels representing the parties, and considered the laws cited and relied upon by the parties in this case, it is hereby

FAITH MISSION INTERNATIONAL V. INTESTATE ESTATE JAMES B. MARSHALL (01/25/2023) 0

FAITH MISSION INTERNATIONAL V. INTESTATE ESTATE JAMES B. MARSHALL (01/25/2023)

On September 24, 2011, the Intestate Estate of James B. Marshall, appellee herein, instituted an action of ejectment against the Faith Mission International Church, appellant herein, for a piece of land lying and situated in Gardnersville, Montserrado County. The appellee alleged in its complaint that it initially filed an action of summary proceeding to recover possession of real property

MAJOR DIXON, SALVATION ARMY vs. CATHERINE JOHNSON WHISNANT (12/15/2022) 0

MAJOR DIXON, SALVATION ARMY vs. CATHERINE JOHNSON WHISNANT (12/15/2022)

When this case was called for hearing on November 17, 2021, the Court observed from the certified records that the counsel representing the Salvation Army Church, the present appellant, had filed a written excuse with the Clerk of Court requesting postponement of the case for an unspecified period of time due to his absence out of the bailiwick of the Country pursuing certain medical treatment.