Tagged: JUDGEMENT

Paul Raspal and Upjit Singh Sachdeva VS Bindu Fatumata Dukuly 0

Paul Raspal and Upjit Singh Sachdeva VS Bindu Fatumata Dukuly

When this case was called for hearing, Counselor Cooper W. Krauh of the Henries Law Firm appeared for the movants/appellees. Counselor C. Alexander Zoe of the Zoe and Partners Law Offices appeared for the respondent/a appellant.

Having reviewed the contentions raised in both the motion to dismiss the appeal and the resistance thereto, and having taken cognizance of the relevant laws appertaining thereto, it is hereby

Amara M. Sheriff and Cathrine M. Sheriff VS Pastor Melvin Parwon 0

Amara M. Sheriff and Cathrine M. Sheriff VS Pastor Melvin Parwon

When this case was cailed fbr hearing, Counsellor Amara M. Sheriff of the Sherman and
Sherman Inc., appeared for the movants/appellees. Counsellor Peter W. Howard, appeared for there respondents/appellants.

Having carefully examined the records, and listened to the arguments on both sides and
considered the evidence and the laws relevant thereto, it is hereby

NEC and Jim Womba Tornonlah VS NPP 0

NEC and Jim Womba Tornonlah VS NPP

When this case was called for hearing, Counselor Joseph N. Blidi, In-House Counsel, appeared for the National Elections Commission (NEC), Informant. Counsellor Albert S, Sims appeared for Co-Informant, Jim Womba Tornonlah. Counsellors Saymah Syrenius Cephus and James N. Kumeh appeared for Respondent, National Patriotic Party (NPP). Counsellor Yamie Quiqui Gbeisay
appeared for the Congress for Democratic Change (CDC) and Prof. Ansu D. Sonii

Having reviewed the certified records and the submissions made by the parties, it is hereby