Tagged: PETITION FOR RE-ARGUMENT

Varney Mambu Dennis, the Intestate Estate of David Coleman vs The Intestate Estate of James Morris (05/21/2026) 0

2026 Opinions / Justice Clinton Johnson / Recent Decisions

21 May, 2026

Varney Mambu Dennis, the Intestate Estate of David Coleman vs The Intestate Estate of James Morris (05/21/2026)

This petition for re-argument emanates from this Court’s unanimous Opinion affirming the ruling of the trial court in an ejectment action where the trial judge affirmed the jury’s verdict, in which the respondent was ordered placed in possession of its property thereof by this Court, according to the metes and bounds of its deed that was pleaded.
In the petition for re-argument, the petitioners are contending that this Court ignored the issue of the trial court’s denial of a motion for investigative survey, for reason that the said motion was untimely filed; that the act of this Court, in ignoring

Re-argument_ELIZABETH MARSH VS. UNITED MUSLIMS (02/18/2025) 0

2025 Opinins / Justice Clinton Johnson / Recent Decisions

18 Feb, 2025

Re-argument_ELIZABETH MARSH VS. UNITED MUSLIMS (02/18/2025)

December 19, 2024, the Supreme Court delivered an Opinion in a motion to dismiss an appeal, during the October Term of Court A.D 2024, filed by the movant, now respondent in this petition for re-argument, based on Part 1, Rule IX of the Revised Rules of the Supreme Court, which states that “For good cause shown to the Court by petition, a re-argument of a cause may be allowed only once when some palpable substantial mistake is made by inadvertently overlooking some facts, or point of law.” In that case, the Supreme Court delivered the appeal of the Petitioner.

The

Liberia Sheng Xin De Yuan v. Mr. John P. Saah Re-argument (05/19/2023) 0

2023 Opinions / Justice Kaba / Recent Decisions

19 May, 2023

Liberia Sheng Xin De Yuan v. Mr. John P. Saah Re-argument (05/19/2023)

Rule IX of the Revised Rules of the Supreme Court provides in part that “for good cause shown to the Court by petition, a re-argument of a cause may be allowed only once when some palpable substantial mistake is made by inadvertently overlooking some fact, or point of law.”

This petition for re-argument grows out of this Court’s decision delivered on December 15, 2022 during its October Term on a motion to dismiss appeal filed by the respondent herein, Mr. John P. Saah, against an appeal taken by Liberia Sheng Xin De Yuan Mining Company, petitioner herein, from a final ruling of the 16th Judicial Circuit for Gbapolu County in an action of damages for wrong. In that Opinion, this Court found that the petitioner herein, filed its bill of exceptions on May 11, 2022 outside the statutory period of ten days which rendered its appeal dismissed. We quote succinct parts of that Opinion as follows:

REARGUMENT CISCO (9/4/2020) 0

2020 Decisions / Recent Decisions

4 Sep, 2020

REARGUMENT CISCO (9/4/2020)

On November 19, 2019, the Supreme Court en banc had arguments on an appeal arising from a judgment entered by the Civil Law Court, Sixth Judicial Circuit, involving an action of damages for wrong filed by Mrs. Gail Cisco against the New Africa Technology Company

Related

Recent Comments

More